next up previous
Next: Implications of Magellan Up: Lithospheric Properties Previous: Lithospheric Properties

Studies of Lithospheric Flexure

Previous to the Magellan mission, the only well-constrained estimate of the flexural rigidity of Venus' lithosphere was of an area north of Freyja Montes, interpreted as a flexural bulge due to underthrusting of lowland plains under the mountain belt [ Solomon and Head, 1990]. Using Venera 15/16 topography data, these workers found best-fitting elastic thicknesses of approximately 11--18 km and thermal gradients near the expected global mean (14--23 K km). The spatial resolution and incomplete coverage of Venera 15/16 data generally did not allow similar measurements to be carried out elsewhere.

Magellan altimetry permits similar analysis to be carried out at many suitable locations on Venus; thus far, most are in the topographic annuli of coronae. Magellan observations of over 300 coronae have revealed a great deal of morphologic diversity [ Stofan et al., 1992]. Within that diverse group are a number of relatively large coronae (typically >300 km in diameter) that are characterized by a deep topographic trough (or chasma) with an outer rise. Noting the similarity between the outer rise/trough topography and examples of flexural topography on Earth, Sandwell and Schubert [1992] modeled the trench-outer rise topography as a thin-plate flexure due to a line load and bending moment. They chose four large coronae (Eithinoha, Heng-o, Artemis, and Latona) and found best-fitting elastic thicknesses of 15, 40, 37, and 35 km, respectively. The larger elastic thicknesses require extremely low thermal gradients (<10 K km) and heat flows of less than half the expected planetary average. For comparison, the elastic thickness at Hawaii is estimated to be km [ Watts and Cochran, 1974] and at subduction zones may reach values as large as 50 km [ Caldwell and Turcotte, 1979].

Brown and Grimm [1993] have examined an inelastic model (i.e., one allowing for the finite strength of the lithosphere) for Artemis Corona, and suggest that thermal gradients of <5 K km and the addition of unrealistically high in-plane stresses are required to reproduce the observed topography. It is worth noting that none of these studies consider the effect of finite (as opposed to infinitesimal) amounts of flexure of the lithosphere, which might be expected to relax the constraints cited by Brown and Grimm [1993]. A subduction hypothesis for chasmata (i.e., deep topographic troughs) in the vicinity of Latona and Artemis Corona has also been criticized as failing to explain aspects of the deformational features observed in Magellan images [ Hansen and Phillips, 1993], although the detailed morphologic analysis did not match the regions examined by Sandwell and Schubert [1992].

Johnson and Sandwell [1994] identified an additional 12 possible sites of flexure, and found somewhat smaller values of elastic thickness (12--34 km), corresponding to thermal gradients in the range of 8--14 K km. Possible implications of the low thermal gradients thus obtained are discussed below.

In addition to requiring extremely strong lithospheres and low thermal gradients, Sandwell and Schubert's [1992] flexural model requires the presence of a load sufficient to create a large bending moment. The author's favored explanation was that the outer rise of these large coronae was a manifestation of retrograde subduction of the lithosphere beneath the corona. More recent analyses of Magellan gravity data (see below) appear broadly consistent with such an hypothesis.



next up previous
Next: Implications of Magellan Up: Lithospheric Properties Previous: Lithospheric Properties



U.S. National Report to IUGG, 1991-1994
Rev. Geophys. Vol. 33 Suppl., © 1995 American Geophysical Union