next up previous
Next: Global Tectonics Up: Lithospheric Properties Previous: Implications of Magellan

A New Flow Law for Venus' Crust

The crust of Venus is widely believed to be composed primarily of basaltic material (or the intrusive equivalent, diabase). One major source of uncertainty in models for deformation of Venus crustal rocks has been the rheology of diabase. Previously, the best available experimental data suggested that under the high temperature conditions of Venus, diabase would undergo ductile deformation at a depth of a few km and would be considerably weaker than mantle rocks. Thus, if the crust were more than km thick, a zone of weak lower crust sandwiched between a stronger, brittle upper crust, and a strong uppermost mantle would be present on Venus. Such a rheological structure has numerous implications for Venus tectonics, including the response of the crust and lithosphere to mantle convective stresses [ Bindschadler and Parmentier, 1990], and an upper bound of --30 km for crustal thickness on Venus [ Zuber, 1987; Grimm and Solomon, 1988].

Previous experiments were done using samples that contained far more water than is likely to be present in the arid, high-temperature conditions on Venus. In a recent set of experiments [ Mackwell and Kohlstedt, 1993; Mackwell et al., 1994], diabase samples were thoroughly dried before deformation. The result was a large increase in strength, suggesting that Venus' crustal materials are not significantly weaker than mantle rocks. The new data do not rule out the presence of a ductile lower crustal layer on Venus, but they do suggest that higher temperature gradients and/or lower strain rates are required for crustal rocks to deform in a ductile manner. Moreover, the data indicate that if the lower crust is weak compared to upper crustal rocks, it is not significantly weaker than mantle rocks under the same conditions, and may even be stronger under certain conditions [ Mackwell et al., 1994]. Thus, the thickness of Venus' crust remains quite uncertain.

A related issue is raised by the presence of extreme topographic slopes in some parts of Venus, most notably in Western Ishtar Terra [ Ford and Pettengill, 1992; Kaula et al., 1992]. Western Ishtar Terra is a high plateau, rising km above the nearby lowlands and almost completely surrounded by mountain belts which rise an additional 2--8 km above the plateau. The highest part of the region is Maxwell Montes, which is dominated by compressional tectonic features and all but devoid of extensional features [ Kaula et al., 1992]. Topographic slopes commonly exceed 2--3 in the region and reach values in excess of 20. Smrekar and Solomon [1992] used a finite-element approach to model viscoelastic relaxation of a high plateau such as W. Ishtar Terra. Results obtained using a now-obsolete (and relatively weak) flow law for diabase suggested that a region like Maxwell Montes is either less than 10 m.y. old, or is currently supported by tectonic stresses. Although these results are not simply extrapolated to include the new flow law, additional calculations performed using a relatively stiff websterite flow law (i.e., more similar to the dry diabase results) [ Smrekar and Solomon, 1992] suggest that the steep topography of the region is unlikely to have been supported by the strength of the lithosphere for m.y.

Notwithstanding the new data on the strength of crustal rocks, observations of tectonic features on Venus indicate a strong tendency toward spacings of --20 km [ e.g., Solomon et al., 1992], which are best explained by tectonic models that include significant weakening of the lithosphere below depths of a few km. Since a relatively weak Venus lithosphere is at odds with interpretations of the present-day gravity and topography, it may be that such features are a remnant of a past epoch in which thermal gradients were higher and lithospheric strengths lower [ Zuber, 1994].



next up previous
Next: Global Tectonics Up: Lithospheric Properties Previous: Implications of Magellan



U.S. National Report to IUGG, 1991-1994
Rev. Geophys. Vol. 33 Suppl., © 1995 American Geophysical Union