Next: The culture of
Up: The General Context
Previous: Promises.
Change is endemic and isn't going
to go away. (note: For example the December 13, 1993 issue of
Fortune contained six articles on the cover theme of
``Managing in the Era of Change,'' including one entitled ``How
Will We Live With the Tumult'' which referred to ``Continuous
business revolution [that] will upend millions of American
lives.'') All alert institutions sense this and are nervous.
Change that will unsettle science has already drastically
affected other sectors. For example, under the Cold War paradigm
the Defense Department had been able to plan against a fairly
well-characterized threat, but now it can plan on nothing but
ever-changing threats. Ironically, while seeking institutional
and funding stability for itself, science accelerates change for
everyone, and for science the end of the Cold War marks the
resumption of history not its end. That is, it marks the end of
a time of abnormally stable, rigid polarization. Some of our
current dilemmas are due to old tensions whose expression during
the Cold War was suppressed, ignored, or occasionally exploited
and incorporated into that war. A final ironic change: having
contributed mightily to the victory over the USSR, science has
worked itself out of a job.
Compared to the spectrum of Cold War science, different
science may be supported in the new era; probably less
reductionist, with growth likely in fields of higher-order
complexity such as ecology, earth science, and the social
sciences [Waldrop, 1992; Schweber,
1993; Ruelle, 1994].
Many in the science community know change is needed to
respond to a changing context [NRC 1994, Schmidt 1994, Hoffman
1992]. However, others deny the relevance of external change,
perhaps because they feel science is sacrosanct and should be
accommodated through adjustments by the rest of society.
U.S. National Report to IUGG, 1991-1994
Rev. Geophys. Vol. 33
Suppl., © 1995 American Geophysical Union