next up previous
Next: Roller-Bearings and Dizzy Up: Plate motions and crustal Previous: Revisions to the

Cenozoic Plate Motions

Some of the most important unanswered questions about Cenozoic plate motions concern the magnitude and timing of deformation within Antarctica and other plates in the southern ocean basins, and their effects on plate circuits used to reconstruct Cenozoic plate positions. Acton and Gordon [1994] examine whether published plate reconstructions for the period 70-20 Myr can bring paleomagnetic poles of similar ages but from different plates into coincidence after they are rotated into a common reference frame. They find that paleomagnetic poles from sites located on plates other than the Pacific, when rotated into a fixed Pacific reference frame via a circuit that incorporates plate boundaries surrounding Antarctica, differ significantly from coeval paleomagnetic poles determined from sites on the Pacific plate. They suggest that a systematic error within the global plate circuit, possibly as a result of deformation within Antarctica or the southern Pacific, is the most likely of several alternative explanations for the angular discrepancy between fixed Pacific and rotated non-Pacific paleomagnetic poles. New marine geophysical data from the southern Pacific and Antarctic margins however suggest that any internal deformation of the Antarctic plate probably occurred earlier than Chron 27 (64 Myr), although a full description of this work has not yet been published [ Cande et al., 1992; Raymond et al., 1993].

Two studies of Indian, Australian, and Eurasian plate motions have provided useful information related to the Himalayan mountain belt and initiation of distributed deformation within the seafloor south of India. Using paleomagnetic observations derived from Ocean Drilling Project (ODP) Sites 756-758 along the Ninetyeast Ridge, Klootwijk et al. [1991] conclude that India's rapid northward motion of 180-195 mm yr prior to 55 Myr slowed dramatically to 45 mm yr after 55 Myr, and possibly again at 17 Myr. They interpret the decrease at 55 Myr as evidence for completion of the suture between India and Asia. The possible decrease at 17 Myr coincides roughly with rapid denudation and possibly, enhanced uplift of the Himalayas after 20 Myr [ Harrison et al., 1992]. Results reported in Royer and Chang [1991] raise the intriguing possibility that the initiation of deformation across a wide equatorial zone south of India may coincide with the latter event. Royer and Chang demonstrate that magnetic anomaly and fracture zone crossings from the Indian, Africa, Australian and Antarctic plates require that motion between India and Australia across their oceanic boundary south of India pre-dates Chron 5 (11 Myr), implying that a prominent 7-8 Ma unconformity present in drill cores from ODP Leg 116 in the central Indian basin [ Stow et al., 1989] does not mark the onset of regional-scale deformation related to India-Australia motion.



next up previous
Next: Roller-Bearings and Dizzy Up: Plate motions and crustal Previous: Revisions to the



U.S. National Report to IUGG, 1991-1994
Rev. Geophys. Vol. 33 Suppl., © 1995 American Geophysical Union