The debate over the sources of cement can not be considered complete without a discussion of the related controversy over the isochemical nature of shales. Is shale diagenesis an isochemical process or do reactants and products move readily between shales and interbedded sandstones? Given the fact that in a large number of sedimentary basins, the volume of shale greatly exceeds the volume of reservoir sandstone, this is a critical question, and one that remains a notable gap in our understanding of basinal diagenesis.
Since the 1970's, various researchers have addressed this
question and come to differing conclusions, although recent
publications seem to sugest that shales are not isochemical. For
example, Milliken and Land (1993) present petrographic and
geochemical evidence from Oligo-Miocene mudstones in South Texas
for wide spread dissolution of carbonate grains and early diagenetic
carbonate cement, unaccompanied by local re-precipitation. The
authors argue that such removal of carbonate must have required a
massive acid source extraneous to the shales or adjacent sandstones
where no acid sources could be identified. Other authors (see,
e.g. Whiteman and Harrison, in press, and Winsch and Kvale, 1994;
Bloch and Hutcheon, 1992) also observed mass transfer within
shales, and failed to detect significant cementation gradients away
from the shales. Finally, recent work by Awwiller (1993) indicates
that the K
O content of Gulf Coast shales actually increases
2-4% with burial to 4,000 m. His calculations suggest that some of
the increase can be explained by a greater abundance of silt-sized
K-feldspar grains in the deeper portions of the basin. However, at
least some of the K
must be imported, presumbly from
interbedded sandstones. The implication is that Gulf Coast
mudrocks acted as open systems during burial diagenesis. Mass
balance calculations based on the K
content of present-day
porewaters suggest that as much as 10
pore volumes of fluids
may have passed through the most K-enriched shales (Awwiller,
1993), a number that has generated lively debate among shale
researchers. This debate is likely to continue, because it has
significant implications for whether shales serve as sources of
diagenetic cements in sandstones.