An interhemispheric CO
transport in the deep ocean which
might reconcile Tans et al. with the ocean models would seem to be
ruled out by the lack of sufficiently large pCO
deficits in
the North Atlantic. If the story ended here we would clearly be at
an impasse. However, Sarmiento and Sundquist (1992) reminded us
that the oceanic CO
sink determined by
pCO
actually underestimates the oceanic sink because the ocean
naturally outgasses CO
to the atmosphere to balance
terrestrial sinks.
CO
is taken up on land by chemical reactions when carbonate
and silicate rocks are weathered. Cations released by the
weathering reactions and bicarbonate ions from atmospheric CO
flow into the ocean via rivers. Riverine bicarbonate is released
back to the atmosphere as CO
when calcium is taken up by
marine organisms to form CaCO
. If rock weathering on land is
in balance with the burial of CaCO
on the sea floor and
decarbonation reactions during sediment metamorphism, then an
amount of CO
is outgassed from the ocean which balances the
CO
uptake on land (Sarmiento and Sundquist, 1992). This
outgassing reduces the ocean-wide
pCO
and reduces the
amount of anthropogenic CO
uptake that one would infer from
pCO
measurements.
Rivers also carry particulate and dissolved organic carbon from the
land to the sea. Some of this organic matter is buried in
sediments, but much of it is remineralized in the ocean. The
remineralized carbon must also be outgassed from the ocean and
cycled back through the atmosphere in order to maintain a steady
cycle. Thus river fluxes of carbon, both as bicarbonate and as
organic matter, tend to mask the flux of anthropogenic CO
going into the ocean. Sarmiento and Sundquist estimate that as
much as half of the 1.0-1.5 GtC/yr discrepancy between the oceanic
uptake in Tans et al. (1990) and in ocean models can be explained
by aspects of the natural carbon cycle involving rivers.
River fluxes are also important because of the location within the
ocean where CaCO
is formed and where riverine organic matter
is oxidized. The North Atlantic and Arctic Oceans receive the
drainage from a disproportionate share of the world's land area.
This means that the oxidation of riverine organic matter should be
especially large in the North Atlantic and Arctic on a per unit
area basis. The polar seas of the North Atlantic are also
dominated by organisms which produce much greater sinking fluxes of
CaCO
than organisms in polar seas elsewhere (Honjo, 1990).
Both of these effects tend to focus the CO
outgassing due to
river fluxes in the North Atlantic and to mask the flux of
anthropogenic CO
that one infers from
pCO
.
Sarmiento and Sundquist (1992) and Robertson and Watson (1992)
raise the issue of ocean ``skin'' temperature. The temperature of
ocean water within 1 mm of the ocean-atmosphere interface is known
to be about 0.3
C cooler than water in the bulk mixed layer
due to thermal radiation and evaporation. This cooling while small
has a rather large effect on the
pCO
that governs
ocean-atmosphere CO
exchange. A skin effect of 0.3
C
lowers the pCO
at the interface by 4 ppm. Since the average
ocean-wide
pCO
needed to move 2 GtC/yr into the ocean
is only about 8 ppm, it is easy to see how important the skin
effect can be. Robertson and Watson estimate that the skin effect
may account for an additional 0.7 GtC/yr of ocean uptake.
River fluxes and the skin temperature effect are large enough to
bring the global system close to balance and still allow
substantial CO
uptake by the ocean (Sarmiento and Sundquist,
1992). However, it remains to be seen whether these effects can
produce a big enough effect in the North Atlantic to satisfy the
atmospheric transport models.